DOXING AS A TOOL FOR ILLEGAL PRACTICES AND REGULATION
Keywords:
doxing, proteção de dados, regulaçãoAbstract
The present research aims to investigate the practice of doxing and identify the conflicts and illegalities arising therefrom in the context of the processing of personal data, considering other fundamental rights, democratic pillars, which allow the activity of doxing, as well as analyzing the current regulation of this matter at national and global level. To do so, we start from the following research problems: could doxing be a tool for committing illegal acts in the digital context, in what ways and how do the main global laws regulate this influence? As preliminary hypotheses, we have that doxing can be used as a tool or means for the perpetration of various cybercrimes, from crimes such as extortion, stalking, harassment and threats, to crimes that result in real physical harm, such as attacks, lynchings and cyberterrorism, as well as as well as several other malicious purposes. Even so, it is preliminarily understood that doxing is not necessarily criminalized as a single practice, but several actions involved in its execution can be the target of legal sanctions that are necessarily deeply linked to the social context in which these laws are applied. The specific objectives are two, which are: a) to analyze how doxing can be used to commit illegal acts; and, b) understand how the main global legislations that have addressed this issue. It ends by confirming the preliminary hypothesis listed. Methodology: hypothetical-deductive, with a qualitative approach and bibliographical approach.
References
AHN, Jaeouk et al. Comparison of the physical and mental health problems of unemployed with employees in South Korea. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, v. 76, n. 3, p. 163- 172, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19338244.2020.1783503. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
ALEMANHA. Bundersministerium der Justiz. Bundesdatenschutzgesetz. Berlim, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bdsg_2018/. Acesso em: 03 jan. 2024.
AL-KHATER, Wadha Abdullah et al. Comprehensive review of cybercrime detection techniques. IEEE Access, v. 8, p. 137293-137311, 2020. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9146148/. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
ANDERSON, Briony; WOOD, Mark A. Doxxing: A Scoping Review and Typology. In: BAILEY, Jane; FLYNN, Asher; HENRY, Nicola. The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/9781 839828485. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2023.
ANGUITA R, Pedro. Freedom of Expression in Social Networks and Doxing. In: CORREDOIRA, Loreto; MALLÉN, Ignacio Bel; PRESUEL, Rodrigo Cetina. The Handbook of Communication Rigts, Law, and Ethics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2021. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119719564.ch23. Acesso em: 08 jan. 2024.
BARRIO, Ana del. Así se cambió el Código Penal por el video sexual de Olvido Hormigos”. El Mundo. Madrid, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.elmundo.es/madrid/2019/05/30/5cee6365fc6c83ae2a8b45a6.html. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
BARRUL FUENTES, María Alejandra. Intimidad, Sexting y Derecho Penal. Facultade de Dereito, Universidade da Coruña, 2020. Disponível em: https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/26978. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição Federal do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 01 nov. 2023.
BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1940. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
BRASIL. Lei nº 7.716, de 5 de janeiro de 1989. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1989. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7716.htm. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 12.737, de 30 de novembro de 2012. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2012. Disponivel em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12737.htm. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709compilado.htm. Acesso em: 04 jan. 2024.
BRASIL. Lei nº 14.811, de 12 de janeiro de 2024. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/L14811.htm. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
CANINI, Renata. Os efeitos do discurso sobre a violência: uma análise do crime de ódio no Brasil. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.econ.puc-rio.br/biblioteca.php/?titulo=&numero=&autor=&ano_inicial=&tipo=7&ano_final=&page=13. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2023.
CAYE, Ana Adelaide Brasil Sá. Crimes de ódio no sistema de justiça criminal brasileiro. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da FMP, v. 17, n. 1, p. 92-94, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas.fmp.edu.br/index.php/FMP-Revista/article/view/297. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
CBS NEWS. Supreme Court will hear two cases seeking to hold social media companies financially responsible for terrorist attacks. 03 out. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-social-media-terrorism-lawsuits-nohemi-gonzalez-nawras-alassaf/. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
CHEN, Mengtong; CHEUNG, Anne Shann Yue; CHAN, Ko Ling. Doxing: What adolescents look for and their intentions. International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 16, n. 2, p. 218, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/218. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
CHEUNG, Anne. Doxing and the challenge to legal regulation: When personal data become a weapon. In: The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021. p. 577-594. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211041. Acesso em: 05 de dez. 2023.
CONJUR. Após bloquear site racista, juíza tem dados vazados na internet e é ameaçada. 26 jan. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2018-jan-26/bloquear-site-racista-juiza-ameacada-dados-divulgados/. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2023.
COREIA DO SUL. Act on promotion of information and communications network utilization, and information protection. 1986. Disponível em: https://elaw.klri.re.kr/kor_service/lawView.do?hseq=50484&lang=ENG. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2023.
DOUGLAS, David M. Doxing: A conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), p. 199–210. 2016. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-016-9406-0. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2023.
ECKERT, Stine; METZGER-RIFTKIN, Jade. Doxxing. In: The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication. ROSS, Karen (ed.) et al. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2020. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119429128. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
ESPANHA. Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal. Agéncia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado, 1995. Disponível em: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA. [Constituição (1787)]. Constitution of the United States. Filadélfia, PA: Constitutional Convention, 1787. Disponível em: https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm. Acesso em: 08 jan. 2024.
ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA. Suprema Corte. Gonzalez et al. v. Google LLC. Julgado em: 18 mai. 2023. Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/598/21-1333/. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA. Suprema Corte. Twitter, Inc v. Taamneh et al. Julgado em: 18 mai. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1496_d18f.pdf. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
FORNASIER, Mateus de Oliveira; BORGES, Gustavo Silveira. The Chinese 'Sharp Eyes' System in the Era of Hyper Surveillance: Between State Use and Risks to Privacy. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, v. 13, p. 440, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.gti.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/7997/pdf. Acesso em: 19 de mar. 2024.
FRÓS, Carla Carrion. Crimes de ódio. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da FMP, v. 17, n. 1, p. 95-98, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas.fmp.edu.br/index.php/FMP-Revista/article/view/298. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2023.
GRECO, Rogério. Curso de direito penal: volume 2: parte especial : artigos 121 a 212 do Código Penal. 19. ed. Barueri: Atlas, 2022.
G1. Entenda o caso de Edward Snowden, que revelou espionagem dos EUA. São Paulo, 2013. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2013/07/entenda-o-caso-de-edward-snowden-que-revelou-espionagem-dos-eua.html. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
G1. Grupo de hackers vaza em rede social supostos dados pessoais de Bolsonaro, filhos e ministros. Brasília, 2020. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2020/06/02/grupo-de-hackers-vaza-em-rede-social-supostos-dados-pessoais-de-bolsonaro-filhos-e-apoiadores.ghtml. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
HA, Serin. Por que Coreia do Sul tem os maiores índices de suicídio entre países desenvolvidos. BBC News Brasil. 2 nov. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c4n4gjxr0e3o. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
HADJIMATHEOU, Chloe. Como Coreia do Sul se tornou um dos países com mais insones. BBC News Brasil. 18 abr. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-61138819. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
HOLANDA. Government of The Netherlands. Use of personal data for the objective of harassment to become criminal offence. 12 jun. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.government.nl/latest/news/2023/07/12/use-of-personal-data-for-the-objective-of-harassment-to-become-criminal-offence. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
HONG KONG. Doxxing Offences. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.pcpd.org.hk/english/doxxing/index.html. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
IBARRA, Juan Carlos Hortal (coord.). Manual de Derecho Penal Parte Especial. Adaptado a las LLOO 1/2019 y 2/2019 de Reforma del Código Penal. Doctrina y jurisprudencia con casos solucionados. 2. ed. Valência: Tirant lo Blanch, 2019.
KARIMI, Younes; SQUICCIARINI, Anna; WILSON, Shomir. Automated detection of doxing on twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, v. 6, n. CSCW2, p. 1-24, 2022. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3555167. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
KIM, Jihoon; LEE, Yeungjeom; JENNINGS, Wesley G. A path from traditional bullying to cyberbullying in South Korea: Examining the roles of self-control and deviant peer association in the different forms of bullying. Journal of interpersonal violence, v. 37, n. 9-10, p. 5937-5957, 2022. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/08862605211067022. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
KIM, Soojeong et al. The effects and challenges of alcohol use disorder peer support service in South Korea: A focus group study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2023. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/inm.13230. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
KLYMENKO, Olga A.; GUTSALYUK, Mykhaylo V.; SAVCHENKO, Andrii V. Combating cybercrime as a prerequisite for the development of the digital society. JANUS. NET e-journal of International Relations, v. 11, p. 18-29, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ual.pt/handle/11144/4542. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
KWON, Doo Hyuk et al. The mental health and sleep quality of the medical staff at a hub-hospital against COVID-19 in South Korea. Journal of Sleep Medicine, v. 17, n. 1, p. 93-97, 2020. Disponível em: https://e-jsm.org/journal/view.php?number=281. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
LEE, Jungup et al. A social-ecological approach to understanding the relationship between cyberbullying victimization and suicidal ideation in South Korean adolescents: The moderating effect of school connectedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 20, p. 10623, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02185385.2020.1774409. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
LEE, Seung Won et al. Association between mental illness and COVID-19 susceptibility and clinical outcomes in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry, v. 7, n. 12, p. 1025-1031, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(20)30421-1/fulltext. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
LI, Jiang et al. Examining China's internet policies through a bibliometric approach. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 237-253, 2018. Disponível em: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201816936726878.page. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
LINDVALL, Alexander J. Political hacktivism: doxing & the first amendment. Creighton L. Rev., v. 53, p. 1, 2019. Disponível em: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/creigh53&div=5&id=&page=. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
MACALLISTER, Julia M. The doxing dilemma: seeking a remedy for the malicious publication of personal information. Fordham Law Review, v. 85, p. 2451, 2016. Disponível em: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/flr85&div=98&id=&page=. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
MCINTYRE, Victoria. " Do (x) You Really Want to Hurt Me?": Adapting IIED as a Solution to Doxing by Reshaping Intent. Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., v. 19, p. 111, 2016. Disponível em: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/tuljtip19&div=8&id=&page=. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
MIAO, Weishan; JIANG, Min; PANG, Yunxia. Historicizing internet regulation in China: A meta-analysis of Chinese internet policies (1994–2017). International Journal of Communication, v. 15, p. 24, 2021. Disponível em: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15944. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
MUELLER, Milton L.; TAN, Zixiang. China in the information age: Telecommunication and the dilemmas of reform. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., 1996.
MURPHY, Lorraine. Did Anonymous Unmask the Wrong Guy in Its Hunt for the Man Who Allegedly Drove a Teen to Suicide? Slate.com. 17 out. 2012. Disponível em: https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/amanda-todd-suicide-did-anonymous-dox-the-wrong-guy.html. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
NEGRO, Gianluigi. Internet in China. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
NEUBAUM, German et al. United in the name of justice: How conformity processes in social media may influence online vigilantism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, v. 7, n. 2, p. 185, 2018. Disponível em: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-11413-001. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza. Manual de direito penal : volume único. 19. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2023.
OLIVEIRA, Xavier de. Estudo de direito penal comparado acerca da jurisdição universal nos sistemas penais brasileiro e espanhol. INTER: Revista de Direito Internacional e Direitos Humanos da UFRJ. v. 3, n. 1, 2020. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/inter/article/view/35018. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
PORTUGAL. Constituição da República Portuguesa. Disponível em: https://www.parlamento.pt/Parlamento/Documents/CRP1976.pdf. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2023.
QUON, Kimberly. Implementing a Standard of Care to Provide Protection from a Lawless Internet. Whittier L. Rev., v. 31, p. 589, 2009. Disponível em: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/whitlr31&div=25&id=&page=. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
REPÚBLICA POPULAR DA CHINA. The "Regulations on Ecological Governance of Internet Information Content" clearly prohibit illegal activities such as human flesh searches and traffic fraud. Xinhua News Agency. 21 dez. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-12/21/content_5462826.htm. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
REUTERS. Dutch Senate votes to make “doxing” a crime. Reuters. [Amsterdam], 11 jul. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-senate-votes-make-doxing-crime-2023-07-11/. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
SCHOENEBECK, Sarita; LAMPE, Cliff; TRIỆU, Penny. Online Harassment: Assessing Harms and Remedies. Social Media+ Society, v. 9, n. 1, p. 20563051231157297, 2023. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20563051231157297. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
SNOWDEN, Edward. Eterna vigilância: Como montei e desvendei o maior esquema de espionagem do mundo. Planeta, 2019. Edição do Kindle.
SOLOVE, Daniel J. The future of reputation: gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. Yale: Yale University Press, 2007.
SORCE, Giuliana; DUMITRICA, Delia. Transnational dimensions in digital activism and protest. Review of communication, v. 22, n. 3, p. 157-174, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15358593.2022.2107877. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2024.
TAN, Albert. To Dox or Not to Dox, that is The Question. 01 fev. 2022. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4369643 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369643. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2023.
TEIXEIRA, Pedro S. O que é doxing? Entenda prática que expõe pessoas, mas não é crime no Brasil. Folha de São Paulo. [São Paulo], 26 jan. 2023. Disponível em: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/tec/2023/01/o-que-e-doxing-entenda-pratica-que-expoe-pessoas-mas-nao-e-crime-no-brasil.shtml. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
VARSHNEY, Gaurav et al. Anti-phishing: A comprehensive perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 238, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095741742302701X. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
WOO, Kyung Soo et al. Mental health, smartphone use type, and screen time among adolescents in South Korea. Psychology research and behavior management, p. 1419-1428, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/PRBM.S324235. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
YANG, Feng; MUELLER, Milton L. Internet governance in China: A content analysis. Chinese Journal of Communication, v. 7, n. 4, p. 446-465, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17544750.2014.936954. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
YAR, Majid; STEINMETZ, Kevin. Cybercrime and Society. SAGE Publications, 2019. Edição do Kindle.
YOO, Changmin. What are the characteristics of cyberbullying victims and perpetrators among South Korean students and how do their experiences change?. Child Abuse & Neglect, v. 113, p. 104923, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213420305780. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier, Fernanda Viero da Silva, Benhur Aurélio Formentini Nunes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in Mackenzie Law Review belongs to the authors, who grant Mackenzie Presbyterian University the rights of publication of the contents, and the assignment takes effect upon submission of the article, or work in similar form, to the electronic system of institutional publications. The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical alterations to the originals, with the aim of maintaining the cultured standard of the language, respecting, however, the style of the authors. The content reported and the opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their exclusive responsibility.