ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A SUPPORT INSTRUMENT FOR RATIONALITY IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Authors

  • Sr. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI
  • Sr. Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (Mexico)
  • Sr. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI

Abstract

The article seeks to apply AI to the rationality of the legislative process: avoiding contradictions and reinforcing the coherence and efficiency of legislation in the environment of legislative overproduction. The rationalities of the legislative process are pointed out and explained, correlating them with means of AI’s usage, so that the legislative process obeys the certainty of law and legal certainty required by Rule of Law.

Author Biographies

Sr. , Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI

Professor of the Master’s and Doctorate courses in the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Legal Science at the Universidade do Vale do Itajaí. Coordinator and professor of the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Law at the Universidade de Passo Fundo. Post-doctorate in Law from the University of Seville, Spain.

PhD in Law from the Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS (2008). Master’s in Law from the Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul – UNISC (2000). Bachelor degree in Law from the Universidade de Cruz Alta – UNICRUZ (1997).

Sr., Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (Mexico)

Professor at the Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (Mexico), PhD in Philosophy specializing in Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights at the University of Alicante, Spain. Specialist in Constitutional Justice and Legal Argumentation at the Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Spain. Full-time Research Professor and Vice Dean of Research and Graduate Studies of the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of the Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Mexico. Member of the National System of Investigators Level I of the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico. Member of the Instituto Iberoamericano de Estudios Constitucionales, Spain. Legal Advisor of the LXIV Legislature of the Chamber of Deputies of the H. Congreso de la Unión, Mexico

Sr., Universidade do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI

Master’s in Law from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). PhD Law student at Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI). Law Judge of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS).

References

ALEXY, Robert, 2011. Teoria da argumentação jurídica. . 3. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.

ATIENZA, Manuel, 1987. Por una razonable definición de “razonable.” Doxa. 1987. P. 189–200.

ATIENZA, Manuel, 2013. Curso de argumentación jurídica. . Madrid: Trotta.

AVILA, Humberto, 2011. Segurança Jurídica. . São Paulo: Malheiros.

BONAT, Debora and HARTMANN PEIXOTO, Fabiano, 2020. Inteligência Artificial e Precedentes. . Curitiba: Alteridade. Coleção Direito, Racionalidade e Inteligência Artificial.

Câmara lança Ulysses, robô digital que articula dados legislativos - Notícias, 2018. Portal da Câmara dos Deputados. Online. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. Available from: https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/548730-camara-lanca-ulysses-robo-digital-que-articula-dados-legislativos/

A Câmara dos Deputados lançou nesta quarta-feira (28) uma nova ferramenta em seu portal, para facilitar a transparência e a interação da instituição com a sociedade: o robô digital Ulysses. Ele conjuga vários algoritmos de inteligência artificial, o que permitirá a articulação automática de diversos dados legislativos disponíveis no portal da Câmara e em vários sistemas da Casa.

COPELAND, Michael, 2016. The Difference Between AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning? NVIDIA Blog. Online. 29 July 2016. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. Available from: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2016/07/29/whats-difference-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-deep-learning-ai/

AI, machine learning, and deep learning are terms that are often used interchangeably. But they are not the same things.

FENOLL, Jordi Nieva, 2018. Inteligencia artificial y processo judicial. . Madrid: Marcial Pons.

FISCHER, Ernst, 1979. A necessidade da arte. . Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

GUTIERREZ, Andriei, 2019. É possível confiar em um sistema de inteligência artificial?: práticas em torno da melhoria da sua confiança, segurança e evidências de accountability. In: Inteligência artificial e direito: ética, regulação e responsabilidade. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.

LEAL, Victor Coutinho, 2017. O conceito constitucional de faturamento para efeitos da incidência da contribuição social ao PIS e Confins. . Master’s in Law. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP).

MACCORMICK, Neil, 2008. Retórica e o Estado de Direito. . Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

MCCARTHY, John, 2007. What is Artificial Intelligence? Computer Science Department Stanford University Stanford. John McCarthy’s Home Page. Online. 12 November 2007. [Accessed 27 July 2022]. Available from: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/

MORAIS DA ROSA, Alexandre, 2019. A questão digital. Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi. 26 September 2019. Vol. 6, no. 02, p. e259–e259. DOI 10.29293/rdfg.v6i02.259.

MORAIS DA ROSA, Alexandre, 2020. Inteligência artificial e Direito: ensinando um robô a julgar. ConJur. Online. 2020. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. Available from: https://www.conjur.com.br/2020-set-04/limite-penal-inteligencia-artificial-direito-ensinando-robo-julgar

MORRIS, Charles W. and RUDOLF, Carnap, 1955. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. . Chicago: Chicago Univerity Press.

OECD, 2020. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Online. 2020. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. Available from: https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/artificial-intelligence/pdfs/oecd-recommendation-on-ai-en.pdf

PERELMAN, Chaim, 2000. O razoável e o desarrazoado em direito. . São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

RADBRUCH, Gustav, 1946. Suddeutsche Juristenzeitung. .

SAERLE, John, 1997. A redescoberta da mente. . São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

SAERLE, John, 1998. O mistério da consciência. . São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

SAS: Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Data Management, [no date]. Online. [Accessed 27 July 2022]. Available from: https://www.sas.com/pt_br/202206/home.html

SAS is the leader in analytics. Through innovative Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Data Management software and services, SAS helps turn your data into better decisions.

WALDRON, Jeremy, 1999. Law and desagreement. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-25

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024): Revista Direito Mackenzie

Section

Historicism of Law and Legal Rationality and Social Systems

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Liton Lanes Pilau Sobrinho, José Luis Leal Espinoza, Luís Clóvis Machado da Rocha Junior

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The copyright of the articles published in Mackenzie Law Review belongs to the authors, who grant Mackenzie Presbyterian University the rights of publication of the contents, and the assignment takes effect upon submission of the article, or work in similar form, to the electronic system of institutional publications. The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical alterations to the originals, with the aim of maintaining the cultured standard of the language, respecting, however, the style of the authors. The content reported and the opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their exclusive responsibility.