POPULISM AS A LEGAL PROBLEM: IMPACTS OF POPULIST SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v15n114554Abstract
This paper intends to analyze the impacts of populist discourse in
the Democratic State of Law. For this, it is divided into two parts. The first turns
to the conceptualization of this political phenomenon, structurally linked to democracy
and institutionalist, based on unmet popular demands. The second part
deals with the Democratic State and the crisis verified in the Law as a product
of the State, understood as a space not only of normative production, but also of
access to a set of demands. It is, therefore, not only a breach to the emergence
of populist discourse in the eyes of this study – especially in countries of late
modernity – as well as a form of social and political organization to be further
weakened by it. After all, it is concluded that populism is projected, especially, as
an attempt, among other factors, to rewrite Constitutions, acting at the margin
of institutions. The method is phenomenological-hermeneutic.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Giancarlo Montagner Copelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in Mackenzie Law Review belongs to the authors, who grant Mackenzie Presbyterian University the rights of publication of the contents, and the assignment takes effect upon submission of the article, or work in similar form, to the electronic system of institutional publications. The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical alterations to the originals, with the aim of maintaining the cultured standard of the language, respecting, however, the style of the authors. The content reported and the opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their exclusive responsibility.
