Imagine the city
Plural praxis and the production of shared places
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/cadernospos.v22n1p32-49Keywords:
Plural praxis; Paraisópolis; Urban Commons; Shared places; Insurgent citizenship.Abstract
This article approaches the processes of collective action and technical collaboration, starting from the premise that the project is an instrument of transformation of the territory toward social innovation. In this sense, "imagine paraisópolis" was a collaborative experience of urban design in informal settlements, whose main objective was the exchange of knowledge, practices and experiences, between professionals and students of architecture and urbanism and adolescents, residents of Paraisópolis, a slum in the city of São Paulo, for the collaborative production of shared places. Organized around five plural praxis - strategy, collaboration, experimentation, reflection and expression - this article criticizes the participatory project in the microscale. Thus, concepts that are part of the current urban debate – "insurgent citizenship" as resistance to hegemonic planning are presented; "plural praxis" as collaborative project processes; "urban commons", fields of action in public spaces; and, finally, "shared places", territorialities favorable to the embodied presence and difference in public space. Thinking about ways to improve everyday life in the city, favoring the human being and social relations as essential to the city, proved to be an opportunity for reflection on the role of plural praxis in the production of shared places.
Downloads
References
AGNEW, J. Place and politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1987.
AGNEW, J. Representing Space: Space, Scale and Culture in Social Science. In:
DUNCAN, J. (org.). Place, Culture, Representation. Nova Iorque: Routledge,
p. 251-271.
ALEXANDER, C., ISHIKAWA, S., SILVERSTEIN, M., JACOBSON, M., FIKSDAHL-KING, I., &
ANGEL, S. Uma linguagem de padrões: a pattern language. Porto Alegre:
Bookman, 2013.
ARNSTEIN, S. A ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of
Planners, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 216-224, 1969. Disponível em: https://www.tandf
online.com/toc/rjpa19/35/4. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
BORCH, C.; KORNBERGER, M. Urban Commons: Rethinking the City. Londres:
Routledge, 2015.
BRENNER, N. Espaços da Urbanização: o urbano a partir da teoria crítica. Rio de Janeiro:
Letra Capital, Observatório das Metrópolis, 2018.
CARLOS, A. F. A O espaço-tempo da práxis urbana na modernidade. Boletim Paulista de
Geografia, São Paulo, v. 100, p. 1-16, 2018. Disponível em: https://gesp.fflch.usp.
br/sites/gesp.fflch.usp.br/files/Espa%C3%A7o-Tempo%20da%20Vida%20Cotidi
ana%20na%20Metr%C3%B3pole_.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
CARLOS, E. Movimentos sociais e instituições participativas: Efeitos do engajamento
institucional nos padrões de ação coletiva. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais,
São Paulo, v. 30, n. 88, p. 83-98, jun. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.
br/ j/rbcsoc/a/k8sNWd8Drjt7f9LHwSXSWMP/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em:
jan. 2021
CRUZ, S. R. S.; PAULINO, S. R. Urban Commons in Active Mobility Experiences.
International Journal of the Commons, Reino Unido, v. 14, n. 1, p. 539-552, 2020.
Disponível em: https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/37/volume/14/issue/1/.
Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
DARDOT, P.; LAVAL, C. Comum: Ensaio sobre a Revolução no Século XXI. São Paulo:
Boitempo, 2016.
Del GAUDIO, C. Os desafios para o design no âmbito social e as perspectivas futuras: o
conceito de infraestruturação e a redefinição do papel do designer. In: Del
GAUDIO, C.; PEREIRA, A. F. (orgs.). Ecovisões projetuais: pesquisas em design e
sustentabilidade no Brasil. São Paulo: Blucher, 2017, p. 65 -80.
Del GAUDIO, C., Franzato, C., & Oliveira, A. Sharing design agency with local partners in
participatory design. International Journal of Design, Taiwan, v. 10, n. 1, p. 53-64,
Disponível em: 718 (ijdesign.org). Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
FEINBERG, A.; GHORBANI, A.; HERDER, P. Diversity and Challenges of the Urban
Commons: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of the Commons,
Reino Unido, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-20, 01 abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.
thecommonsjournal.org/38/volume/15/issue/1/. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
FONTES, A. S. Intervenções Temporárias, Marcas Permanentes: Apropriações, Arte e
Festa na Cidade Contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Palavra/FAPERJ, 2013.
FOSTER, S.; LAIONE, C. The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, New Haven –
EUA, v. 281, n. 34, p. 281-349, 2016. Disponível em: https://ylpr.yale.edu/citycommons.
Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
FOSTER, S.; LAIONE, C. Ostrom in the City: Design Principles and Practices for the
Urban Commons. In: COLE, D.; HUDSON, B.; ROSENBLOOM, J. (eds.).
Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. 1. ed. Londres: Routledge,
p. 1–24.
GEHL, J. Cidades para pessoas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2013.
HALL, S. Da diáspora. Identidades e mediações culturais. Belo Horizonte: Editora
UFMG, 2013.
HARDIN, G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, Nova Iorque, v. 162, 13 dez. 1968, p.
–1248. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.
3859.1243. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Bem-estar Comum. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2009.
HARVEY, D. Cidades Rebeldes: do direito à cidade à Revolução Urbana. São Paulo:
Martins Fontes, 2014.
HARVEY, D. Contested Cities: Social Process and Spatial Form. In: JEWSON, N.; MACGREGOR.
S. (org.). Transforming Cities. Londres: Routledge, 1997. p. 19-27.
HESS, C. Mapping the New Commons. In: 12TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF THE COMMONS, Anais [...].
Cheltenham: University of Gloucestershire, 2008.
HILLGREN, P.A.; SERAVALLI, A.; EMILSON, A. Prototyping and infrastructuring in design
for social innovation. CoDesign, v. 7, n. 3-4, p. 169-183, 2011. Disponível em:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630474. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
HOLSTON, J. Cidadania insurgente: disjunções da democracia e da modernidade no
Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2013.
HUYBRECHTS, L. et al. Democratic dialogues that make cities ‘work’. Strategic Design
Research Journal, São Leopoldo – RS, v. 9, n. 2, p. 100-111, maio/ago., 2016.
Disponível em: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.
05. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
JACOBS, J. The death and life of Great American cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Books, 1961.
LACAZE, J-P. Os métodos do urbanismo. Campinas, São Paulo: Papirus, 1993.
LINEBAUGH, P. The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley,
Califórnia: University of California Press, 2008.
MANZINI, E. Design when everybody designs. An introduction to design for social
innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.
MONTANER, J. M. Do diagrama às experiências, rumo a uma arquitetura de ação. São
Paulo: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 2017.
MOORE, S. A. Tecnologias, lugar e regionalismo não moderno. In: SYKES, K. (org.) O
campo ampliado da arquitetura. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2013. p. 278-293.
MOUFFE, C. Sobre o político. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes, 2015.
OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action.
Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
PARKER, P. Ed.; SCHMIDT, S. Enabling urban commons. CoDesign, Reino Unido, v. 13, n.
, p. 202-2013, 01 ago. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/
abs/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355000. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2021.
ROSA, M. Planejamento: práticas urbanas criativas. São Paulo: Editora de Cultura, 2011.
SURI, J. F. The experience of evolution: developments in design practice. The Design
Journal, Londres v. 6, n. 2, p. 39-48, 2003. Disponível em: https://www.tandf
online.com/doi/abs/10.2752/146069203789355471. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2021.
SOUZA, M. L. Os conceitos fundamentais da pesquisa sócio-espacial. Rio de Janeiro:
Bertrand Brasil, 2013.
STAVRIDES, S. Common Space: The city as commons. Londres: Zed Books, 2016.
TELI, M.; BORDIN, S.; BLANCO, M. M.; ORABONA, G.; De ANGELI, A. Public design of
digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human
Computer Studies, Reino Unido, v. 81, p. 17-30, set. 2015. Disponível em:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1071581915000269.
Acesso em: 18 de fev. 2021.
THIOLLENT, M. Metodologia da Pesquisa-Ação. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
WISNIK, G. Projeto e Utopia: de volta à arena pública. In: NOVAES, A. (org.). Mutações: o
Novo Espírito Utópico. São Paulo: Edições Sesc São Paulo, 2016. p. 341-349.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the Project simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the Project with recognition of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the Project published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), indicating that it was originally published in this journal, with a link to the article.