Escala de Llamados Ocupacionales: Propiedades Psicométricas e Invariancia de la Versión Brasileña
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo traducir, adaptar y presentar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Unificada Multidimensional de Llamado - UMCS, así como la invariancia de la medida por sexo para la población brasileña. El estudio incluyó una muestra de 2111 trabajadores adultos (67% mujeres), con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 77 años (M = 41,70; DT = 11,10). La versión brasileña de la escala mostró mejores índices de ajuste con una estructura de siete factores e invariancia de género. Además, la medida presentó evidencia externa con trabajo significativo, orientación profesional proteica, satisfacción laboral, satisfacción con la vida y adicción al trabajo. Se concluyó que los resultados obtenidos amplían la red nomológica del constructo denominado Llamados Ocupacionales y discuten sus implicaciones teóricas y prácticas. Los resultados son favorables para el uso de la medida adaptada en contextos de investigación y evaluación en temas de carrera en Brasil.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Psicología: Teoría y Practica pertenecen a los autores, quienes otorgan a la Universidad Presbiteriana Mackenzie los derechos no exclusivos para publicar el contenido.
Citas
Ahmed, U., Majid, A., Al-Aali, L., & Mozammel, S. (2019). Can meaningful work really moderate the relationship between supervisor support, coworker support and work Engagement? Management Science Letters, 9(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.11.016
Andrade, A. L. D., Omar, A., & Salessi, S. (2020). Generic Job Satisfaction Scale: Psychometric Qualities of the Version Adapted to Portuguese. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1904.15804.02
Andrade, A. L. de, Teixeira, M. A. P. T., & de Oliveira, M. Z. (2022). The Brazilian Portuguese adaptation of Protean Career Orientation Scale: invariance, correlates, and life/career stages. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-022-09539-x
Baruch, Y. (2014). The development and validation of a measure for protean career orientation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 2702–2723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.896389
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Publication.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Carlotto, M. S., & Miralles, M. D. L. (2010). Translation, adaptation, and exploration of psychometric properties of” Dutch Work Addiction Scale”(DUWAS). Contextos Clínicos, 3(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.4013/ctc.2010.32.08
Clinton, M. E., Conway, N., & Sturges, J. (2017). “It’s tough hanging-up a call”: The relationships between calling and work hours, psychological detachment, sleep quality, and morning vigor. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000025
Dik, B. J., & Shimizu, A. B. (2019). Multiple meanings of calling: Next steps for studying an evolving construct. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(2), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748676
Dobrow, S. R., Weisman, H., Heller, D., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2019). Calling Attention to 20 Years of Research: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Calling [Proceedings]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 1121-1126, Briarcliff Manor, NY. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.199
Douglass, R. P., Duffy, R. D., & Autin, K. L. (2016). Living a calling, nationality, and life satisfaction: A moderated, multiple mediator model. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715580324
Duffy, R. D., Douglass, R. P., Autin, K. L., England, J., & Dik, B. J. (2016). Does the dark side of a calling exist? Examining potential negative effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(6), 634-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137626
Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Velez, B. L. (2018). Work as a calling: A theoretical model. Journal of counseling psychology, 65(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000276
Faletehan, A. F., van Burg, E., Thompson, N. A., & Wempe, J. (2021). Called to volunteer and stay longer: the significance of work calling for volunteering motivation and retention. Voluntary Sector Review, 12(1), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080520X15929332587023
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193146
Hirschi, A., Keller, A. C., & Spurk, D. (2019). Calling as a double-edged sword for work- nonwork enrichment and conflict among older workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.004
International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2nd edition). www.InTestCom.org.
Lysova, E. I., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., Khapova, S. N., & Arthur, M. B. (2019). Calling and careers: New insights and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.004
Praskova, A., Hood, M., & Creed, P. A. (2014). Testing a calling model of psychological career success in Australian young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.04.004
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., Bakker, A. (2006). Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. J. Burke (ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193-217). Edward Elgar. doi.org/10.4337/9781847202833.00018
Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2019). Research on work as a calling… and how to make it matter. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015140
Vianello, M., Dalla Rosa, A., Anselmi, P., & Galliani, E. M. (2018). Validity and measurement invariance of the Unified Multidimensional Calling Scale (UMCS): A three-wave survey study. Plos one, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209348
Vianello, M., Galliani, E. M., Rosa, A. D., & Anselmi, P. (2020). The developmental trajectories of calling: Predictors and outcomes. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(1), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719831276
Yang, F., & Liu, Q. (2021). The consequences of calling. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(9), 1647-1656. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01647
Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0478-5
Zanotelli, L. G., Andrade, A. L. de, & Peixoto, J. M. (2022). Work as meaning inventory: Psychometric properties and additional evidence of the Brazilian version. Paidéia, 32, e3225. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3225