Traducción y Evidencia de Validez de la Escala Básica de Empatía
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo de esta investigación fue adaptar y buscar evidencias de validez para la Escala de Empatía Básica (EEB). Para obtener los datos, se aplicó el instrumento proporcionando un enlace en línea en una plataforma digital. El estudio contó con 376 participantes, 311 mujeres y 62 hombres, con una edad media de 30,9 años (DE = 13,3). Los datos fueron recolectados por la plataforma REDCAP® y analizados por SPSS Statistics 23.0 y Factor. Para el análisis de datos se utilizó el método de extracción de datos de Análisis Paralelo. La validación brasileña del EBE reveló propiedades psicométricas adecuadas, específicamente a nivel estructural de dos factores (KMO = 0,85; IED > 0,9). La consistencia interna fue de 0,83. Las validez convergente y discriminante tuvieron correlaciones significativas. De los índices psicométricos adecuados, se puede concluir que el instrumento se adaptó adecuadamente a la población brasileña.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Psicología: Teoría y Practica pertenecen a los autores, quienes otorgan a la Universidad Presbiteriana Mackenzie los derechos no exclusivos para publicar el contenido.
Citas
Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. https://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf
Basto-Pereira, M., & Farrington, D. P. (2020). The basic empathy scale: Psychometric properties and contributions to the understanding of antisocial behaviour. In D. Jolliffe & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Empathy versus offending, aggression and bullying: Advancing knowledge using the basic empathy scale. Routledge.
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: Algumas considerações. Paidéia, 22(53), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014
Čavojova, V., Sirota, M., & Belovi čova, Z. (2012). Slovak validation of the basic empathy scale in preadolescents. Studia Psychologica, 54(3), 195–208. https://www.academia.edu/8120501/Slovak_validation_of_Basic_Empathy_Scale_in_pre_adolescents
Carré, A., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., Stefaniak, N. & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor Structure of a Revised Form. Psychological Assessment, 25(5), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297
D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020
Davis, M. H. (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. (1991). Empathy related responding and cognition: a “chicken and the egg” dilemma. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (vol. 2, pp. 63-88). Erlbaum.
Falcone, E. M. de O., Ferreira, M. C., Luz, R. C. M. da, Fernandes, C. S., Faria, C. de A., D’Augustin, J. F., Sardinha, A., & Pinho, V. D. de. (2008). Inventário de Empatia (I.E): Desenvolvimento e validação de uma medida brasileira. Avaliação psicológica, 7(3), 321–334. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712008000300006&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Falcone, E. M. de O., Pinho, V. D. de, Ferreira, M. C., Fernandes, C. dos S., D’Augustin, J. F., Krieger, S., Plácido, M. G., Vianna, K. de O., Electo, L. C. T., & Pinheiro, L. C. (2013). Validade convergente do Inventário de Empatia (IE). Psico-USF, 18(2), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712013000200004
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
Geng, Y., Xia, D., & Qin, B. (2012). The basic empathy scale: A Chinese validation of a measure of empathy in adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43(4), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0278-6
Hauck-Filho, N., & Teixeira, M. A. P. (2014). Revisiting the psychometric properties of the Levenson selfreport psychopathy scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 459–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.865196
Hein, S., Röder, M., & Fingerle, M. (2018). The role of emotion regulation in situational empathy-related responding and prosocial behavior in the presence of the negative affect. International Journal of Psychology, 53(6), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12405
Herrera-López, M., Gómez-Ortiz, O., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Jolliffe, D., & Romera, E. M. (2017). Suitability of a three-dimensional model to measure empathy and its relationship with social and normative adjustment in Spanish adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 7(9), e015347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-01534770-y
Heynen, E. J. E., Helm, G. H. P. Van der, Stams, G. J. J. M., & Korebrits, A. M. (2016). Measuring empathy in a German youth prison: A validation of the German version of the basic empathy scale (BES) in a sample of incarcerated juvenile offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and Offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
Koller, S. H., Camino, C., & Ribeiro, J. (2001). Adaptação e validação interna de duas escalas de empatia para uso no Brasil. Estudos de Psicologia, 18(3), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2001000300004
Lockwood, P. L., Seara-Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. (2014). Emotion regulation moderates the association between empathy and prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e96555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096555
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: A method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicologia, 25(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.08
Pasquali, L. (2013). Psicometria: Teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Vozes.
Pechorro, P., Ray, J. V., Salas-Wright, C. P., Maroco, J., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2015). Adaptation of the Basic Empathy Scale among a Portuguese sample of incarcerated juvenile offenders. Psychology Crime and Law, 1(7), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028546
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006
Sampaio, L. R., Guimarães, P. R. B., Camino, C. P. S., Formiga, N.S. & Menezes, I. G. (2011). Estudos sobre a dimensionalidade da empatia: Tradução e adaptação do Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Psico, 42(1), 67–76. https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/6456
Selltiz, C., Cook, S. W., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1987). Métodos de pesquisa nas relações sociais (vol. 2). Editora Pegagógica e Universitária Ltda.
Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social Indication Research, 45, 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Topçu, Ç., Baker, Ö. E., & Aydin, Y. Ç. (2010). Turkish adaptation of Basic Empathy Scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(34), 174–182. http://turkpdrdergisi.com/index.php/pdr/article/view/191/122
Vinuto, J. (2014). A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: Um debate em aberto. Temáticas, 22(44). https://doi.org/10.20396/tematicas.v22i44.10977
Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314
Zych, I., Farringotn, D. P., Nasaescu, E., Jolliffe, D. & Twardowska-Staszek, E. (2020). Psychometric properties of the basic empathy scale in polis children and adolescents. Current Psychology, 41, 1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00670-y