Tareas de Conciencia Fonológica: Precisión para Predecir las Dificultades de Lectura y Escritura

Contenido principal del artículo

Cláudia Nascimento Guaraldo Justi
Flávia Guimarães Henriques
Francis Ricardo dos Reis Justi
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7107-1672

Resumen

Este estudio evaluó la precisión de las clasificaciones de riesgo / no riesgo de dificultades de lectura y escritura de diferentes medidas de conciencia fonológica (CF). Un total de 213 niños brasileños realizaron seis tareas de CF (variando en unidad fonológica y demanda cognitiva) cuando estaban en el jardín de infancia. Un año después, 176 de esos niños realizaron una tarea de escritura y 174 realizaron una tarea de lectura. Las curvas de las Características Operativas del Receptor se construyeron con base en las puntuaciones de las tareas de lectura y escritura.  Los resultados indicaron que el total de tareas de CF presentaba la mejor área bajo la curva. Sin embargo, la conciencia supra-fonemas y la conciencia de fonemas, también presentaron valores adecuados de sensibilidad y especificidad. Estos resultados son alentadores ya que esas medidas podrían usarse para detectar a los niños en riesgo de dificultades de lectura y escritura.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Sección
Evaluación Psicologica

Citas

Andrade, O. V., Andrade, P. E., & Capellini, S. A. (2013). Identificação precoce do risco para transtornos da atenção e da leitura em sala de sula. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29(2), 167–176.

Catts, H., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Sittner, P., Bridges, M., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163-176.

Clemens, N. H., Shapiro, E. S., & Thoemmes, F. (2011). Improving the efficacy of first grade reading screening: an investigation of word identification fluency with other early literacy indicators. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(3), 231–244.

Coker, D. L. Jr., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Universal screening for writing risk in kindergarten. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(4), 1–12.

Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: a two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409.

Germano, G., César, A., & Capellini, S. (2017). Screening Protocol for Early Identification of Brazilian Children at Risk for Dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, article 1763. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01763.

Good RH, Kaminski RA, Smith S, Laimon D, Dill S. Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. 5th ed. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon; 2001.

Goswami, U., & Bryant, P.E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 582–600.

Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Petscher, Y. (2010). Improving the accuracy of a direct route screening process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(3), 131–140.

Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S., & Hume, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026744

Nelson, J. M. (2008). Beyond Correlational Analysis of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): A Classification Validity Study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 542–552.

Ozernov-Palchik, O., & Graab, N. (2016). Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: Reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia. Wyley Interdisciplynary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7, 156-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1383

Pinheiro, A. (1996). Contagem de frequência de ocorrência e análise psicolinguística de palavras expostas a crianças na faixa pré-escolar e séries iniciais do 1o grau. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Dislexia.

Richardson, U., & Nieminen, L. (2017). The contributions and limits of phonological awareness in learning to read. In N. Kucirkova, C. E. Snow, V. Grøver, & C. McBride (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Early Literacy Education: A Contemporary Guide to Literacy Teaching and Interventions in a Global Context (pp. 264-272). London: Routledge.

Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2004). Early identification of reading disabilities: current status and new directions. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(13), 13–24.

Roazzi, A., Roazzi, M. M., Justi, C., & Justi, F. (2013). A relação entre a habilidade de leitura e a consciência fonológica: estudo longitudinal em crianças pré-escolares. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 13(2), 420-445. Retrived from http://www.revispsi.uerj.br/v13n2/artigos/html/v13n2a03.html

Speece, D. L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K. D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 223–233.

Stein, L. (1994). TDE: Teste de Desempenho Escolar: manual para aplicação e interpretação. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading Acquisition, Developmental Dyslexia, and Skilled Reading Across Languages: A Psycholinguistic Grain Size Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3