Assessment of Apraxias in Patients with Left-Sided Cerebrovascular Lesion

Main Article Content

Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues
Josiane Pawlowski
Murilo Ricardo Zibetti
Rochele Paz Fonseca
Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente

Abstract

Investigations confirm the left hemisphere (LH) is dominant for motor planning. However, more studies on the participation of cortical and subcortical regions of LH in the apraxias are necessary. This multiple cases study analyzed the performance of five patients with ischemic cerebrovascular lesion in LH in three types of apraxias. The participants, aged 43-73 years, were divided into two groups with regard to their lesion site, cortical or subcortical. Tasks of the Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Neupsilin were used. Scores of each case were compared to the average performance of their normative group. Only patients with cortical lesions showed deficits of ideomotor apraxia. In the tasks of constructive apraxias, the error types distinguished the two groups. The qualitative method contributed to understand the mechanisms involved in the apraxias and to plan programs of neuropsychological rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Artigos

References

ARDILA, A. et al. Age‑related cognitive decline during normal aging: the complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, v. 15, n. 6, p. 495‑513, Aug. 2000.

BANHATO, E. F. C. et al. Atividade física, cognição e envelhecimento: estudo de uma comunidade urbana. Psicologia: teoria e prática, v. 11, n. 1, p. 76‑84, 2009.

BENSON, D.; BARTON, M. I. Disturbances in constructional ability. Cortex, v. 6, n. 1, p. 19‑46, Mar. 1970.

BUXBAUM, L. J.; GIOVANNETTI, T.; LIBON D. The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition, v. 44, n. 2, p. 166‑191, Nov. 2000.

CARAMAZZA, A. On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: the case for single‑patient studies. Brain and Cognition, v. 5, n. 1, p. 41‑66, Jan. 1986.

CARAMAZZA, A.; MCCLOSKEY, M. The case for single‑patient studies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, v. 5, n. 5, p. 517‑528, Oct. 1988.

CHAVES, M. L.; IZQUIERDO, I. Differential diagnosis between dementia and depression: a study of efficiency increment. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, v. 11, n. 6, p. 412‑429, June 1992.

COLTHEART, M. Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. In: RAPP, B. (Org.). The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2001. p. 3‑21.

CUBELLI, R. et al. Cognition in action: testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain and Cognition, v. 44, n. 2, p. 144‑165, Nov. 2000.

DE RENZI, E.; FAGLIONI, P.; SORGATO, P. Modality‑specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. Brain, v. 105, p. 301‑31, June 1982.

DECETY, J. et al. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain, v. 120, n. 10, p. 1763‑1777, Oct. 1997.

FONSECA, R. P.; SALLES, J. F.; PARENTE, M. A. M. P. Instrumento de avaliação neuropsicológica breve NEUPSILIN. São Paulo: Vetor, 2009.

GALEANO, A. R.; POLITIS, D. G. Trastornos visuoconstructivos. In: LABOS, E. et al. (Org.). Tratado de neuropsicología clínica. Buenos Aires: Librería Akadia, 2008. p. 253‑257.

GIL, R. Neuropsicologia. São Paulo: Santos, 2002.

GOLDENBERG, G. Imitation and matching of hand and finger posturess. Neuroimage, v.14, n. 1, p. 132‑136, July 2001.

GOLDENBERG, G.; HAGMANN, S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: a study of visuo‑imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia, v. 35, n. 3, p. 333‑341, Mar. 1997.

GUÉRIN, F.; SKA, B.; BELLEVILLE, S. Cognitive processing of drawing abilities. Brain and Cognition, v. 40, n. 3, p. 464‑478, Aug. 1999.

HAALAND,K. Y.;FLAHERTY, D. The different types of limb apraxia errors made by patients with left vs. right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition, v. 3, n. 4, p. 370‑384, 1984.

HAALAND, K. Y.; HARRINGTON, D. L. Hemispheric asymmetry of movement. Current Opinions in Neurobiology,v. 6, n. 6,p.796‑800, Dec. 1996.

HANNA‑PLADDY, B.; HEILMAN, K. M.; FOUNDAS A. L. Cortical and subcortical contributions to idemotor apraxia – analysis of task demands and error types. Brain, v. 124, n. 12, p. 2513‑2527, Dec. 2001.

HEILMAN, K. M.; ROTHI, L. J. G.; VALENSTEIN, E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology, v. 32, n. 4, p. 342‑346, Apr. 1982.

HEILMAN, K. M.; ROTHI, L. J. G. Apraxia. In: HEILMAN, K. M.; VALENSTEIN, E. (Org.). Clinical neuropsychology. 3. ed.New York: North Holland, 1993. p. 141‑163.

HEILMAN, K. M.; WATSON, R. T.; ROTHI, L. J. G. Limb apraxias. In: SNYDER, P. J.; NUS‑SBAUM, P. D.; ROBINS, D. L. (Org.). Clinical neuropsychology. Washington: APA, 2006. p. 534‑546.

KOSKI, L.; IACOBONI, M.; MAZZIOTTA, J. C. Desconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology, v. 15, n. 1, p. 71‑77, Feb. 2002.

LEIGUARDA, R. Limb apraxia: cortical or subcortical. NeuroImage, v. 14, n. 1, p. 137‑141, July 2001.

LIEPMANN, H. The left hemisphere and action. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario, 1905.

______. Drei aufsatze aus dem apraxiegebiet. Berlin: Kargerp, 1908.

OGAWA, K.; INUI, T. The role of the posterior parietal cortex in drawing by copying. Neuropsychologia, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1013‑1022, Mar. 2009.

POLITIS, D. G. Alteraciones en la imitación gestual (apraxia de conducción). Revista de Neurología, v. 38, n. 8, p. 741‑745, 2004.

POLITIS, D. G.; RUBINSTEIN, S. Evaluación de las apraxias. In: BURIN, D. I.; DRAKE, M. A.; HARRIS, P. (Org.). Evaluación neuropsicológica en adultos. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2007. p. 187‑212.

ROTHI, L. J. G.; HEILMAN, K. M.; WATSON, R. T. Pantomime comprehension and ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, v. 48, n. 3, p. 207‑210, 1985.

ROTHI, L. J. G.; OCHIPA, C.; HEILMAN, K. M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, v. 8, n. 6, p. 443‑458, Dec. 1991.

______. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis and apraxia. In: ROTHI, L. J. G.; HEILMAN, K. M. (Ed.). Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action. Psychology Press, 1997. p. 29‑49.

SCHOENBERG, M. R. et al. Test performance and classification statistics for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test in selected clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, v. 21, n. 7, p. 693‑703, Oct. 2006.

SILVERI, M. C.; CICCARELLI, N. Semantic memory in object use. Neuropsychologia, v. 47, n. 12, p. 2634‑2641, Oct. 2009.

WATSON, R. T.; HEILMAN, K. M. Callosal apraxia. Brain, v. 106, p. 391‑403, June 1983.

WETTER, S.; POOLE, J. L.; HAALAND, K. Y. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, v. 86, n. 4, p. 776‑781, Apr. 2005.

WHEATON, L. A.; HALLETT, M. Ideomotor apraxia: a review. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, v. 260, n. 1‑2, p. 1‑10, Sept. 2007.

YESAVAGE, J. A. et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatry Resources, v. 17, n. 1, p. 37‑49, 1983.

YIN, R. K. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.

ZADIKOFF, C.; LANG, A. E. Apraxia in movement disorders. Brain, v. 128, n. 7, p. 1480‑1497, July 2005.