Acquisition of Responses with Different Effort Requirements After Exposure to Noncontingent Stimuli
Main Article Content
Abstract
This experiment investigated whether noncontingent appetitive stimuli exposure has effects in a subsequent response acquisition with different efforts. On the first phase, rats were exposed to contingent events to nose poke response, noncontingent events, or no exposition. On the second phase, the bar press response of the animals was continuously reinforced or submitted to a FR3 schedule. The time and number of reinforcers to response acquisition varied among subjects, and none relation was identified between first phase exposition with response acquisition of different efforts on phase 2. The longest time in response acquisition identified in some subjects occurred due to competitive responses on the first phase followed by appetitive stimuli. Possibilities for future studies and possible implications for the applied context are discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright to articles published in The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice belongs to the authors, who grant Mackenzie Presbyterian University the not exclusive rights to publish the content.
References
Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Beatty, W. W., & Maki, W. S. (1979). Acquisition of instrumental responding following noncontingent reinforcement: Failure to observe learned laziness in rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 268–271. doi:10.3758/BF03335079
Capelari, A., & Hunziker, M. H. L. (2005). Aprendizagem de fuga após exposição a estímulos apetitivos incontroláveis. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 21, 99–107.
Cardoso, L. A., Britto, I. A. G. S., & Simonassi, L. E. (2016). Comportamento supersticioso em estudantes universitários. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 18, 31–44. doi:10.31505/rbtcc.v18i1.829
Engberg, L. A., Hansen, G., Welker, R. L., & Thomas, D. R. (1972). Acquisition of keypecking via autoshaping as a function of prior experience: “Learned Laziness”? Science, 178, 1002–1004. doi:10.1126/science.178.4064.1002
Glazer, H., I., & Weiss, J. M. (1976). Long-term interference effect: An alternative to “learned helplessness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 202–213. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.2.3.202
Hunziker, M. H. L., & Gehm, T. P. (2010). Uma nova interpretação sobre o desamparo aprendido. In E. Cillo, M. R. Garcia, P. Abreu, & P. Faleiros (Orgs.), Sobre comportamento e cognição (Vol. 23, pp. 352–360). Santo André: ESETec.
Job, R. F. S. (1988). Interference and facilitation produced by noncontingent reinforcement in the appetitive situation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 451–460. doi:10.3758/ BF03209386
Kelley, M. E., Nadler, C. B., Rey, C., Cowie, S., & Podlesnik, C. A. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement competes with response performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 343–353. doi:10.1002/jeab.255
Lambert, J. M., Bloom, S. E., Samaha, A. L., Dayton, E., & Kunnavatana, S. S. (2016). Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on the persistence and resurgence of mild aggression. The Psychological Record, 66, 283–289. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0170-7
Lieving, G. A., DeLeon, I. G., Carreau-Webster, A. B., Frank-Crawford, M. A., & Triggs, M. M. (2018). Additional free reinforcers increase persistence of problem behavior in a clinical context: A partial replication of laboratory findings. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109, 253–264. doi:10.1002/jeab.310
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 349–367. doi:10.1037/rev0000033
Moore, T. C., Robinson, C. C., Coleman, M. B., Cihak, D. F., & Park, Y. (2016). Noncontingent reinforcement to improve classroom behavior of a student with developmental disability. Behavior Modification, 40, 640–657. doi:10.1177/0145445516629937
Oakes, W. F., Rosenblum, J. L., & Fox, P. E. (1982). “Manna from heaven”: The effect of noncontingent appetitive reinforcers on learning in rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 123–126. doi:10.3758/BF03330059
Phillips, C. L., Iannaccone, J. A., Rooker, G. W., & Hagopian, L. P. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 1–20. doi:10.1002/jaba.376
Rooker, G. W., Bonner, A. C., Dillon, C. M., & Zarcone J. R. (2018). Behavioral treatment of automatically reinforced SIB: 1982-2015. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 1–24. doi:10.1002/jaba.492
Saini, V., Fisher, W. W., & Pisman, M. D. (2017). Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 377–392. doi:10.1002/jaba.380
Schwartz, B., Reisberg, D., & Vollmecke, T. (1974). Effects of treadle training on autoshaped keypecking: Learned laziness and learned industriousness or response competition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 369–372. doi:10.3758/BF03333501
Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172. doi:10.1037/0096-345.121.3.273
Welker, R. L. (1976). Acquisition of a free operant appetitive response in pigeons as a function of prior experience with response independent food. Learning and Motivation, 7, 394–405. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(76)90045-X