Revisión del Alcance sobre Teoría de la Mente y Bullying: Una Actualización Crítica
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo llevar a cabo una revisión del alcance de estudios que investigan la relación entre Teoría de la Mente (ToM) y el bullying en siete bases de datos de las áreas de salud/psicología (PubMed, PsycInfo y Lilacs), educación (Eric) e interdisciplinares (SciELO, Web of Science y Scopus). De los 270 estudios identificados inicialmente, 14 fueron revisados y analizados con respecto a sus principales resultados, a las medidas utilizadas en ToM y a las variables relacionadas con la clasificación del bullying. Se encontró que la mayoría de los estudios reportaron una relación directa (relaciones que tienden a ser estadísticamente significativas) y/o indirecta (mediada por otras variables) entre los roles de los involucrados y los tipos de bullying y el desempeño en las tareas de ToM. Sin embargo, se realizó un debate crítico sobre las medidas de evaluación en ToM, señalando la necesidad de aclaración en el tipo de evaluación y actualización de las tareas.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Psicología: Teoría y Practica pertenecen a los autores, quienes otorgan a la Universidad Presbiteriana Mackenzie los derechos no exclusivos para publicar el contenido.
Citas
Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
Arseneault, L. (2017). The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20399
Barbosa, V. C., Filho, & Tricco, A. C. (2019). Scoping review: A relevant methodological approach for knowledge synthesis in Brazil’s health literature. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, 24, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.24e0082
Beaudoin, C., Leblanc, É., Gagner, C., & Beauchamp, M. H. (2020). Systematic review and inventory of theory of mind measures for young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02905
Biswas, T., Scott, J. G., Munir, K., Thomas, H. J., Huda, M. M., Hasan, M. M., de Vries, T. D., Baxter, J., & Mamun, A. A.(2020). Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimization amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. eClinical Medicine, 20, 100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276
Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609342983
Clemmensen, L., Jepsen, J. R. M., van Os, J., Blijd-Hoogewys, E. M. A., Rimvall, M. K., Olsen, E. M., Rask, C. U., Bartels-Velthuis, A. A., Skovgaard, A. M., & Jeppesen, P. (2018). Are theory of mind and bullying separately associated with later academic performance among preadolescents? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12263
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
Doenyas, C. (2017). Self versus other oriented social motivation, not lack of empathic or moral ability, explains behavioral outcomes in children with high theory of mind abilities. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9636-4
Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., Kim, D. H., & Nan, L. (2018). Empathy, attitude towards bullying, theory-of-mind, and non-physical forms of bully perpetration and victimization among U. S. middle school students. Child & Youth Care Forum, 47, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9416-z
Fink, E., Rosnay, M. de, Patalay, P., & Hunt, C. (2020). Early pathways to bullying: A prospective longitudinal study examining the influences of theory of mind and social preference on bullying behavior during the first 3 years of school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12328
Gasser, L., & Keller, M. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18(4), 798–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00516.x
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20153
Hall, L., Woods, S., Aylett, R., & Paiva, A. N. A. (2006). Using theory of mind methods to investigate empathic engagement with synthetic characters. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 03(03), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843606000734
Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
Hughes, C., Adlam, A., Happé, F., Jackson, J., Taylor, A., & Caspi, A. (2000). Good test-retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00633
Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2006). Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X82352
Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (2005). Psychological correlates of peer victimization in preschool: Social cognitive skills, executive function and attachment profiles. Aggressive Behavior, 31(6), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20099
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Wiley. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=4qNLY13mkDEC
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Séguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., & Pérusse, D. (2010). Interactive links between theory of mind, peer victimization, and reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9432-z
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
Shakoor, S., Jaffee, S. R., Bowes, L., Ouellet-Morin, I., Andreou, P., Happé, F., Moffitt, T. E., & Arseneault, L. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children’s theory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02488.x
Smith, P. K. (2014). Understanding school bullying: Its nature & prevention strategies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473906853
Smith, P. K. (2017). Bullying and theory of mind: A review. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 13(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573400513666170502123214
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R., & Liefooghe, A. P. D. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used and age and sex differences in a 14-country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00461
Smith, P. K., Sundaram, S., Sandhu, D., Blaya, C., Schäfer, M., & Spears, B. A. (2018). Introduction. In P. Smith, S. Sundaram, B. Spears, C. Blaya, M. Schäfer, & D. Sandhu (Eds.), Bullying, cyberbullying and student well-being in schools (pp. 3–25). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987384.002
Stellwagen, K. K., & Kerig, P. K. (2013). Ringleader bullying: Association with psychopathic narcissism and theory of mind among child psychiatric inpatients. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 44, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0355-5
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social skills deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00083
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165384
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. E., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
van Dijk, A., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Malti, T. (2017). Psychological processes in young bullies versus bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21701
van Roekel, E., Scholte, R. H. J., & Didden, R. (2010). Bullying among adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence and perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0832-2
Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003
Warnell, K. R., & Redcay, E. (2019). Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood. Cognition, 191, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.009