READING PREREQUISITE INSTALLATION IN TWO STUDENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DEFICIENCIES

Main Article Content

Jaci Augusta Neves Souza
Grauben José Alves Assis

Abstract

The syllable recombination to form new words has been shown as a promising alternative to teach generalized reading to individuals with atypical development. However, letter organization to form words is a basic concept necessary to install the rudiments of reading, even if the words are simple with one or two syllable. The present study had the goal of installing the pre-requisites behavioral of graphic symbol ordination of the Roman alphabet in individuals with intellectual deficiencies. Two students from Apae School participated of the study. Non-representational shapes presented in four sizes were initially used and the required response was to select them to form three sequences. Using the same procedure, letters were used as stimuli to form two-syllable words. The results showed that the students were capable of ordering the letters to form words after learning to organize the non-representational stimuli as a prerequisite.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Artigos

References

Assis, G. J. A. & Sampaio, M. E. C.(2003). Efeitos de dois procedimentos de ensino para formação de classes sequenciais. Interação em Psicologia, 7, 52-63.

Alves, K.R.S., Assis, G. J. A., Kato, O. M., & Brino, A. L. F. (2011). Leitura recombinativa após procedimentos de fading in de sílabas das palavras de ensino em pessoas com atraso no desenvolvimento cognitivo. Acta Comportamentalia, 19, 183-203.

Bernardo, M. A. & Dounavi, A. (2011). A matching to sample procedure in teaching generalized reading skills. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. 12, 195-204.

Brino, A. L. & Goulart, P. R. (2009). A emergência da equivalência de estímulos. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. Vol. 5, Num. 2, 123-126.

Correa, D., Assis, G. J., & Brino, A. L. (2012). Efeitos de sobreposição de palavras sobre a composição de sentenças sob controle condicional. Acta Comportamentalia, 20, Num. 3, 299-315.

Dunn, L., Dunn, L M., & Arribas, D. (2006). PPTV-III Peabody Test de vocabulario en imágines. Publicaciones de Psicología Aplicada. TEA Ediciones, S.A. Madrid.

Green, G., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599-616.

Hübner-D’ Oliveira, M. M. & Matos, M. A. (1993). Controle discriminativo na aquisição da leitura: efeito da repetição e variação na posição das sílabas e letras. Temas em Psicologia, 1 (2), 99-108.

Miccione, M., Assis, G. J. A., & Costa, T. D. (2010). Variáveis de controle sobre o responder ordinal: Revisitando estudos empíricos. Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento.

Matos, M. A., Avanzi, A. L., & Mcllvane, W. J. (2006). Rudimentary reading repertoires via stimulus equivalence and recombination of minimal verbal units. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 3-19.

O’Donnell, J. & Saunders, K. (2003). Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 131-157.

Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.

Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior. A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.

Skinner, B. F. (1992). Verbal behavior. Acton, Massachusetts: Copley Publishing Group. (Originalmente publicado em 1957).

Souza, D. G. & Rose, J. C. (2006). Desenvolvendo programas individualizados para o ensino de leitura. Acta Comportamentalia. 14. Num.1. 77-98.

Souza, J. A. N. & Assis, G. J. A. (2005). Efeito de dois procedimentos de ensino sobre o comportamento de ordenar. Psicologia em Estudo. 10, 527-536.

Stromer, R. & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Human sequential behavior: relations among stimuli, class formation, and derived sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 107-131.