Revisão de Escopo sobre Teoria da Mente e Bullying: Uma Atualização Crítica
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O presente estudo teve por objetivo realizar uma revisão de escopo sobre pesquisas que investigam a relação entre a Teoria da Mente (ToM) e o bullying escolar em sete bases de dados nas áreas da saúde/psicologia (PubMed, PsycInfo e Lilacs), da educação (Eric) e interdisciplinares (SciELO, Web of Science e Scopus). Dos 270 arquivos identificados inicialmente, 14 foram elegíveis para a revisão e analisados a respeito dos seus principais resultados, das medidas em ToM utilizadas e das variáveis relacionadas à classificação de bullying. Verificou-se que a maioria dos estudos reportou uma relação direta (relações que tendem a ser estatisticamente significativas) e/ou indireta (mediada por outras variáveis) entre papéis dos envolvidos e tipos de bullying e o desempenho em tarefas de ToM. Contudo, uma discussão crítica em relação às medidas de avaliação em ToM foi realizada e apontou a necessidade de esclarecimento no tipo de avaliação e de atualização das tarefas.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados na Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática pertencem aos autores, que concedem à Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie os direitos não exclusivos de publicação do conteúdo.
Referências
Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
Arseneault, L. (2017). The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20399
Barbosa, V. C., Filho, & Tricco, A. C. (2019). Scoping review: A relevant methodological approach for knowledge synthesis in Brazil’s health literature. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, 24, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.24e0082
Beaudoin, C., Leblanc, É., Gagner, C., & Beauchamp, M. H. (2020). Systematic review and inventory of theory of mind measures for young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02905
Biswas, T., Scott, J. G., Munir, K., Thomas, H. J., Huda, M. M., Hasan, M. M., de Vries, T. D., Baxter, J., & Mamun, A. A.(2020). Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimization amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. eClinical Medicine, 20, 100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276
Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609342983
Clemmensen, L., Jepsen, J. R. M., van Os, J., Blijd-Hoogewys, E. M. A., Rimvall, M. K., Olsen, E. M., Rask, C. U., Bartels-Velthuis, A. A., Skovgaard, A. M., & Jeppesen, P. (2018). Are theory of mind and bullying separately associated with later academic performance among preadolescents? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12263
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
Doenyas, C. (2017). Self versus other oriented social motivation, not lack of empathic or moral ability, explains behavioral outcomes in children with high theory of mind abilities. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9636-4
Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., Kim, D. H., & Nan, L. (2018). Empathy, attitude towards bullying, theory-of-mind, and non-physical forms of bully perpetration and victimization among U. S. middle school students. Child & Youth Care Forum, 47, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9416-z
Fink, E., Rosnay, M. de, Patalay, P., & Hunt, C. (2020). Early pathways to bullying: A prospective longitudinal study examining the influences of theory of mind and social preference on bullying behavior during the first 3 years of school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12328
Gasser, L., & Keller, M. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18(4), 798–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00516.x
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20153
Hall, L., Woods, S., Aylett, R., & Paiva, A. N. A. (2006). Using theory of mind methods to investigate empathic engagement with synthetic characters. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 03(03), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843606000734
Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
Hughes, C., Adlam, A., Happé, F., Jackson, J., Taylor, A., & Caspi, A. (2000). Good test-retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00633
Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2006). Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X82352
Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (2005). Psychological correlates of peer victimization in preschool: Social cognitive skills, executive function and attachment profiles. Aggressive Behavior, 31(6), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20099
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Wiley. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=4qNLY13mkDEC
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Séguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., & Pérusse, D. (2010). Interactive links between theory of mind, peer victimization, and reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9432-z
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
Shakoor, S., Jaffee, S. R., Bowes, L., Ouellet-Morin, I., Andreou, P., Happé, F., Moffitt, T. E., & Arseneault, L. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children’s theory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02488.x
Smith, P. K. (2014). Understanding school bullying: Its nature & prevention strategies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473906853
Smith, P. K. (2017). Bullying and theory of mind: A review. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 13(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573400513666170502123214
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R., & Liefooghe, A. P. D. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used and age and sex differences in a 14-country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00461
Smith, P. K., Sundaram, S., Sandhu, D., Blaya, C., Schäfer, M., & Spears, B. A. (2018). Introduction. In P. Smith, S. Sundaram, B. Spears, C. Blaya, M. Schäfer, & D. Sandhu (Eds.), Bullying, cyberbullying and student well-being in schools (pp. 3–25). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987384.002
Stellwagen, K. K., & Kerig, P. K. (2013). Ringleader bullying: Association with psychopathic narcissism and theory of mind among child psychiatric inpatients. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 44, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0355-5
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social skills deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00083
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165384
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. E., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
van Dijk, A., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Malti, T. (2017). Psychological processes in young bullies versus bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21701
van Roekel, E., Scholte, R. H. J., & Didden, R. (2010). Bullying among adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence and perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0832-2
Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003
Warnell, K. R., & Redcay, E. (2019). Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood. Cognition, 191, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.009