Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.-
As part of the submission process, authors must check conformity of submission in connection with all of the items listed below. Submissions not in accordance with standards will be returned to the authors.
- The contribution is original and unpublished, and is not under assessment for publishing by another periodical.
- The main file with th manuscript for submission is in the Microsoft Word format (and does not exceed 1MB).
- Complete text with at least 7600 words and not over 8400 words, including the covering page, summary, abstract, text’s body, references and appendices.
- Summary between 200 and 250 words
- Title not to exceed 12 words
- URLs for references were informed when required.
- The text is in A4 format, 1.5 spacing, uses 12 point Times New Roman font; employs bold type to highlight words instead of underscoring (save for URL addresses); employs italics only for words in other languages; tables, graphics and figures are inserted in the text’s body as appendices, and not at the document’s end.
- The APA standards described in the Authors’ Guidelines were complied with.
- The text complies with the standards described in Authors’ Guidelines.
- Every reference to the authorship of articles was removed from the file contents and from the Word Properties option, thus ensuring the Journal’s secrecy criteria in accordance with instructions available in Assurance of Blind Assessment by Peers.
- Copies of tables, graphics and figures were provided individually in separate files, in the software font format in which they were created, and will be submitted as complementary files jointly with the main file (text’s body).
- The “institution” field in each authors’ data was completed during the submission process. It contains the chief institution to which authors are affiliated (one only) in full, with two organizational units. For example, department and school or school and university.
- The “Summary of Biography” field in each authors’ data was completed during the submission process. It contains an author’s title (his/her highest ranking academic degree, e.g. Administration undergraduate; Administration bachelor or specialist; Master or Doctor in Administration; lecturer) and the institution that granted it. The Institution should be described with two organizational units. For example, department and school or school and university.
- Following the article’s approval, every author must register with RAM and inform their mailing and email address. The authors authorize this information in addition to their titles and affiliation (completed on submission) to be disclosed on the article’s covering page pursuant to the Journal’s standards. They likewise authorize that their biographies (as completed on submission) be provided for review by readers when accessing the articles in the RAM website.
-
The criteria employed for assessing articlesare as follows:
TITLE
The title must reflect precisely the article’s intention
ABSTRACT
The abstract should be concisely and clearly worded It should contain:
- The survey’s purpose;
- The theoretical base employed;
- The methodology and approach employed;
- The theoretical and empirical cope;
- The chief outcome found when analyzing data (if appropriate);
- Practical implications, i.e. what changes should be made in practicing administration as a result of the survey (if any);
- The work’s originality and its value, including the theoretical and methodological contribution;
- Limitations detected in the course of the survey. Following the abstract, five key words must be inserted in Portuguese
INTRODUCTION
. Contains a rationale of the problem in question
- Describes the justifications for performing the study
- Describes previous relevant surveys that provided am approach to the study
- Describes differences regarding other studies already published
- Makes clear what is being replied (objective)
- Gives rise to advances of knowledge on the subject under study
- In case of an empirical study, puts forth proposals or assumptions that are being created, redefined or added
- Clearly puts forth the survey’s design, in the case of an empirical survey
- Poses arguments that highlight the reasons for the study’s relevance
- Points out clearly what is known and what is unknown
- The topic is up-to-date, involves creativity and an unprecedented approach
THEORETICAL GROUNDS
. Reflects the state of the art of what is under investigation
- Provides a convincing support for scientific knowledge on the topic approached
- Puts forth causal logical or empirical relations while establishing proposals or assumptions
- A review of literature explicits which were the bases employed
- A review of literature includes studies with a lag not in excess of 5 years with regard to the submission date
- The study reflects a critical “conversation” by the mentioned authors
- If the study is a theoretical trial, there is a view stated in its beginning
- The arguments employed in the theoretical trial support the initial view
. The theoretical trial contains a relevant scientific contribution
METHOD - ANALYSIS
- The method’s clear description - comprehensive, objective
- Method appropriate to the problem under consideration
- Analysis appropriate to the method
- Analysis performed in detail
DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION
- The conclusions counter conclusions from other studies
- The results are directly related to the issue broached in the introduction
- The discussion reflects convincing arguments on the progress gained in the knowledge area under study
- The conclusions consider that the passage of time is a factor that changes results. In other words, the results have are valid for the future
- The conclusion reasserts the study’s importance and is convincing when justifying bridging the gap detected
- Does not set forth empirical or logical results unrelated with the objectives
LIMITATIONS - FUTURE STUDIES
- The study explains which were the limitations
- The study submits considerations on future studies
CASE STUDY
- A summary of the SURVEY PROTOCOL is submitted
- Makes clear which was the ANALYSIS UNIT
- MULTIPLE SOURCES of evidence were employed
- Specifies which was the DESIGN ADOPTED (simple, multiple, holistic, built-in)
- Explains which was the STRATEGY for data analysis
- Describes the RELATION among sources of evidence
- Includes elements that reflect attention with RELIABILITY
- Includes elements that assure INTERNAL VALIDITY
- The case sets out CONCURRING THEORIES
PUBLISHING
- structure and editing appropriate for a scientific paper
- Adequacy with the APA standard
- Clear and concise language, free from spelling or grammar mistakes
- Fluent and pleasant reading
Human and Social Management
The Human and Social Management in Organizations section assigns preference to articles concerned in discussing management in the light of social, historical, political, cultural and economic changes. This means that it covers investigations into organizational behavior, which includes human resources management but is not limited to this. Whether based on a critical or more functionalist viewpoint, what is expected are assessments aimed at advancing the field of studies from a theoretical as well as methodological standpoint. Regarding this latter aspect, the section includes texts that question qualitative investigation, quantitative or mixed approaches and strategies Moreover, texts are also deemed important that discuss management training, its advances, dilemmas and trends. Among other topics, preference is assigned to:
- Organizational Values and Dignity.
- Diversity and Inclusion.
- Social Management.
- Change.
- Culture.
- Learning and Competencies.
- Education and Manager Training.
- Management Survey.
Copyright Notice
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.
Privacy Statement
The names and addresses stated in this Journal will be used only for the services provided by this publication, not being made available for any other purposes or to third parties.