Ilusão da Mão de Borracha Induzida por Estímulos Controlados por Equipamento Eletrônico
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
A indução da ilusão da mão de borracha (IMB) é tipicamente realizada por pincéis de forma manual. Nesse sentido, elaboramos um equipamento eletrônico com intuito de aumentar a precisão dos estímulos táteis na IMB. Objetivo: verificar a eficácia de um equipamento eletrônico para indução da IMB. Método: participaram do estudo 51 participantes, com idades entre 11 e 59 anos divididos em quatro grupos. Para coleta de dados utilizamos próteses de mãos e o equipamento eletrônico desenvolvido. A intensidade da IMB foi avaliada por um questionário subjetivo contendo 13 perguntas classificadas entre concordância ou discordância sobre as sensações percebidas do paradigma. Resultados: encontramos efeitos significativos em todas as perguntas de incorporação da mão de borracha. Conclusão: o equipamento eletrônico mostrou-se eficaz na velocidade, sincronia e precisão da movimentação dos pincéis, com indução robusta do paradigma da IMB. Sugere-se a utilização desse equipamento em experimentação científica do paradigma da IMB.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados na Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática pertencem aos autores, que concedem à Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie os direitos não exclusivos de publicação do conteúdo.
Referências
Armel, K. C., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1499‑1506.
Bekrater‑Bodmann, R., Foell, J., Diers, M., & Flor, H. (2012). The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain research, 1452, 130‑139.
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands’ feel’touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756‑756.
Brozzoli, C., Cardinali, L., Pavani, F., & Farnè, A. (2010). Action‑specific remapping of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 796‑802.
Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., & Farnè, A. (2009). Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept?. Brain topography, 21(3‑4), 252‑260.
Cascio, C. J., Foss‑Feig, J. H., Burnette, C. P., Heacock, J. L., & Cosby, A. A. (2012). The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism, 16(4), 406‑419.
Cowie, D., Makin, T. R., & Bremner, A. J. (2013). Children’s responses to the rubber‑hand illusion reveal dissociable pathways in body representation. Psychological Science, 24(5), 762‑769.
Davies, A. M. A., & White, R. C. (2013). A sensational illusion: vision‑touch synaesthesia and the rubber hand paradigm. Cortex, 49(3), 806‑818.
Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P., & Passingham, R. E. (2005). Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(45), 10564‑10573.
Ehrsson, H. H., Rosén, B., Stockselius, A., Ragnö, C., Köhler, P., & Lundborg, G. (2008). Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain, 131(12), 3443‑3452.
Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305(5685), 875‑877.
Ehrsson, H. H., Wiech, K., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(23), 9828‑9833.
Farmer, H., Tajadura‑Jiménez, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2012). Beyond the colour of my skin: How skin colour affects the sense of body‑ownership. Consciousness and cognition, 21(3), 1242‑1256.
Germine, L., Benson, T. L., Cohen, F., & Hooker, C. I. L. (2013). Psychosis‑proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry research, 207(1), 45‑52.
Guterstam, A., Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). The illusion of owning a third arm. PloS one, 6(2), e17208.
Haans, A., Kaiser, F. G., Bouwhuis, D. G., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Individual differences in the rubber‑hand illusion: predicting self‑reports of people’s personal experiences. Acta psychologica, 141(2), 169‑177.
Kammers, M. P., Verhagen, L., Dijkerman, H. C., Hogendoorn, H., De Vignemont, F., & Schutter, D. J. (2009). Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1311‑1320.
Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3), 978‑998.
Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark‑skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition, 128(2), 170‑178.
Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural brain research, 191(1), 1‑10.
Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Current biology, 13(13), R531‑R539.
Mohan, R., Jensen, K. B., Petkova, V. I., Dey, A., Barnsley, N., Ingvar, M., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). No pain relief with the rubber hand illusion. PLoS ONE, 7(12). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052400.
Mussap, A. J., & Salton, N. (2006). A ‘rubber‑hand’ illusion reveals a relationship between perceptual body image and unhealthy body change.Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 627‑639.
Naito, E., Roland, P. E., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2002). I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 36(5), 979‑988.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97‑113.
Paton, B., Hohwy, J., & Enticott, P. G. (2012). The rubber hand illusion reveals proprioceptive and sensorimotor differences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1870‑1883.
Reinersmann, A., Landwehrt, J., Krumova, E. K., Peterburs, J., Ocklenburg, S., Güntürkün, O., & Maier, C. (2013). The rubber hand illusion in complex regional pain syndrome: Preserved ability to integrate a rubber hand indicates intact multisensory integration. Pain, 154(9), 1519‑1527.
Schütz‑Bosbach, S., Tausche, P., & Weiss, C. (2009). Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 136‑144.
Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE, 4(7). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006185.
Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body‑ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703‑712.
Tsakiris, M., Hesse, M. D., Boy, C., Haggard, P., & Fink, G. R. (2007). Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self‑consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2235‑2244.
White, R. C., Davies, A. M. A., & Davies, M. (2011). Two hands are better than one: a new assessment method and a new interpretation of the non‑visual illusion of self‑touch. Consciousness and cognition, 20(3), 956‑964.