Versão Portuguesa das “Escalas de Táticas de Conflito Revisadas”: Estudo de Validação
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
As escalas de Táticas de Conflito Revisadas (CTS2) destinam-se a avaliar o modo como os casais resolvem os seus conflitos, através de estratégias de negociação ou de abuso: (a) abuso físico sem sequelas; (b) agressão psicológica; (c) abuso físico com sequelas; (d) coerção sexual. A versão portuguesa foi administrada a uma amostra de 551 estudantes universitários (332 do sexo feminino), 45 dos quais têm uma relação íntima entre si. Considera os cinco factores propostos pelos autores das escalas originais e apresenta valores de consistência interna compreendidos entre .78 e .50. As correlações entre os diferentes tipos de abuso e a desejabilidade social, história de socialização violenta, crime violento, domínio na relação, e ainda a concordância nos heterorrelatos de ambos elementos da díade, testemunham a validade das escalas. Investigadores e técnicos da psicologia e áreas afins têm agora à sua disposição a versão portuguesa das CTS2, que tem demonstrado elevada aplicabilidade na determinação da presença de relações abusivas no seio da família, na avaliação da eficácia de programas de intervenção no contexto forense e em estudos de cariz epidemiológico.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados na Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática pertencem aos autores, que concedem à Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie os direitos não exclusivos de publicação do conteúdo.
Referências
ADAMS, B. N. Coercion and consensus theories: Some unresolved issues. American Journal of Sociology, 71, p. 714-716, 1965.
ALDORONDO, E., & STRAUS, M. A. (1994). Screening for physical violence in couples therapy: Methodological, practical, and ethical considerations. Family Process, 33, p. 425-439, 1994.
ARMSTRONG, T. G., WERNKE, J. Y., MEDINA, K. L., & SCHAFER, J. Do partners agree about the occurrence of intimate partner violence: A review of the current literature. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 3, 3, p. 181-193, 2000.
BERKOWITZ, L. Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1993.
CAMPBELL, D. T., & FISKE, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, p. 81-105, 1959.
CICCHETTI, D. V. & FEINSTEIN, A. R. High agreement but low kappa: II Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, p. 543-549, 1990.
COSER, L. A. Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press, 1967.
DAHRENDORF, R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959.
DOBASH, R. E., & DOBASH, R. P. Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press, 1979.
DUTTON, D. G. The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. New York: The Guilford Press, 1998.
GELLES, R. J. Physical violence, child abuse, and child homicide: A continuum of violence, or distinct behaviours? Human Nature, 2, p. 59-72, 1991.
GELLES, R. J., & STRAUS, M. A. Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I., Nye, & I. L. Reis (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (p. 549-581). New York: Free Press, 1979.
GERSHOFF, T. E. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviours and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), p. 539-579, 2002.
HAMBY, S. L. The dominance scale: Preliminary psychometric properties. Violence and Victims, 11 (3), p. 199-212, 1996.
HECKERT, D. A. & GONDOLF, E. W. Assessing assault self-reports by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 16(2), p. 181-197, 2000.
HINES, D. A., & SAUDINO, K. J. Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), p.197-217, 2003.
HOLTZWORTH-MUNROE, A., & STUART, G. L. Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the difference among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, p. 476-507, 1994.
JOHNSTON, M. P. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, p. 283-294, 1995.
KURZ, D. Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. Gelles & D. R., Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (p.88-103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
MORAES, C. L., HASSELMANN, M. H., REICHENHEIM, M. E. Portuguese language cross-cultural adaptation of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), an instrument used to identify violence in couples. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 19, p. 163-176, 2002.
O´LEARY, K. D., & MURPHY, C. Clinical issues in the assessment of spouse abuse. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence (p. 26-46). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
O´LEARY, K. D., & VIVIAN, D. Physical aggression in marriage. In T. N. B. F. D. Fincham (Ed.), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (p. 323-348). New York: Guilford Press, 1990.
PAIVA, C. & FIGUEIREDO, B. Validação da versão portuguesa do questionário “Personal and relationships profile”. Psychologica (in press), 2006.
PAIVA, C., & FIGUEIREDO, B. Abuso no relacionamento íntimo: Estudo de prevalência em jovens adultos portugueses. Psychologica, 36, 75-107, 2004.
RAMIREZ, I. L., STRAUS, M. A. The effect of question order on disclosure of intimate partner violence: an experimental test using the conflict tactics scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA, 2001.
REYNOLDS, W. M. Development of reliable and valid short forms of Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, p. 119-125, 1982.
SCHAFER, J., CAETANO, R., & CLARK, C. L. Rates of intimate partner violence in United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88, p. 1702-1704, 1998.
SCHAFER, J., CAETANO, R., & CLARK, C. L. Agreement about violence in U.S.couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, p. 457-470, 2002.
SO-KUM TANG, C. Marital power and aggression in a community sample of Hong Kong Chinese families. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(6), 586, 1999.
STETS, J. E., & STRAUS, M. A. Gender differences in reporting marital violence ansd its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A, Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8.145 families (p.227-244). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, 1990.
STRAUS, M. A. & GELLES, R.J. Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8.145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, 1990.
STRAUS, M. A. Levelling, civility, and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, p. 13-29, 1974.
STRAUS, M. A. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, p. 75-88, 1979.
STRAUS, M. A. The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and the new data on validity and reliability. In In M. A, Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8.145 families (p.49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, 1990a.
STRAUS, M. A. Injury and frequency of assault and the “representative sample fallacy” in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations in 8.145 families (p.75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, 1990b.
STRAUS, M. A. Manual for the Conflict Tactics Scales. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, 1995.
STRAUS, M. A. Cross- cultural reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: A study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross Cultural Research, 38 (4), p. 407-432, 2004.
STRAUS, M. A.; MOURADIAN, V. E. Preliminary psychometric data for the personal and relationships profile (PRP): A multi-scale tool for clinical screening and research on partner violence. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada, 1999.
STRAUS, M. A.; ALDRIGHI. T., ALVAREZ, S. D.; ATAN, A. et al. Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, p. 1-24, 2004.
STRAUS, M. A., GELLES, R. J., & STEINMETZ, S. K. Behind closed doors: Violence in the American Family. NY: Doubleday/Anchor, 1980.
STRAUS, M. A., HAMBY, S. L., BONEY-MCCOY, S., & SUGARMAN, D. B. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, p. 283-316, 1996.