Strategy as social practice: strategizing in a organizational network
Keywords:
Strategy, Social Practice, Organizational Networks, Small and Middle Size Enterprises, ConflictsAbstract
The aim of this paper is to identify and analyze the strategizing process in an organizational network of small and medium size enterprises. We employ the Strategy as Social Practice perspective as reference for the study. This approach assumes that strategies are constituted in everyday life, through interactions among the actors, who negotiate their various and contradictory interests. That approach follows the movement that has occurred in social theory, which focuses on social practices. The research is based on a qualitative case study developed in an interorganizational network at Minas Gerais. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation and documentary analysis. Based on information search in the field we identify the existence of four strategic practices in the network (Negotiating and Purchasing, Pricing Products, Defining Brand and Designing Franchises, Creating the Credit Card). Such strategies have been identified as “individual” or “collective”. “Individual” and “collective” strategies influence each other on the process of strategizing, however, the line that separating them is unclear to the extent that the interests are negotiated. We conclude that the strategies as practice developed in the network, in the course of the relationships between actors, are constantly in tensions and contradictions among various inter-organizational interests. Moreover, the strategies do not follow a consistent logic through deliberate actions towards a clearly defined goal.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.