Groups processess and team management at contemporary work: comprehensions with complex thought
Keywords:
Group processes, Team management, Work, Systemic thought, Complex thought.Abstract
In this article we propose some reflections on possible similarities and differences between group processes and team management knowledges. Despite recognizing that group processes and team management knowledges are very distant and belong to different areas of study, Psychology and Management, we understand that a bridge can be established between them, as we are referring to people in the work and life context regardless if they are groups or teams of people. In the business environment concerns with results reifies an ideology about a true team, from which is expected efficiency and effectiveness, but leaving limited space to include, simultaneously, a reflection about the life relationship at work therefore damaging the subjectivity. The contemporary time immerses team management in a game of power between the individual and the group, between career and yourself (self-reflection), between life and work. Here, based on sistemic thinking, we discuss how the concepts and properties of living systems (namely, interaction, interdependence, self-reliance, organization and production-of-itself) can help us with insights about the contemporary work, upon the mediation of Edgar Morin’s complex thought. We support the possibility of a dialogue between the concepts of team management, group processes and their contexts through the modes of knowledge of comprehension and explanation. Therefore, objectivity and subjectivity, explicit and implicit can complement each other, opening space for subjectivity in the professional dimension, despite recognizing that the quest for objective results is imperative in the post-modern work.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.