WAYS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY ARE SEEN: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE CONSTRUCT OF CONCEPTIONS OF DISABILITY IN WORK SITUATIONS
Keywords:
Diversity, People with Disability, Job, Managers, Conceptions of Disability.Abstract
The researches about the insertion of people with disability (PWD) in the work market have suggested, either explicitly or implicitly, that the way disability is seen by managers and work colleagues, is an important element to understand this dimension of diversity. The aim of this investigation was to identify and make empirical test of a construct which would help us to understand the way disability has been seen by management professionals who work or could be working with people with disability (PWD). The research was carried out with 227 MBA (Master in Business Administration) students from three different universities. The method used was: the Structural Equation Modeling. Taking the test of model into consideration, we were able to verify that the empirical data supported the construct existence – which presupposes that people in the face of disability tend to build explanations to justify the PWD differences. These explanations are thinking modalities which qualify the disability and assess the work possibilities of people with disability and are intimately linked to historical matrixes which gave birth to them. This model was supported by the multidimensional structure of the Conceptions of Disability in Work Situations, which reflects in six factors: spiritual dimension, dimension based on presuppositions of normality, dimension based on inclusion, performance, relationship and benefits.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.