TESTING THE PECKING ORDER THEORY FORECASTS IN BRAZILIAN COMPANIES FINANCING: A NEW METHODOLOGY
Abstract
Considering the existence of asymmetric information between managers and investors, Myers (1984) affirms that the configuration of corporate capital structure is based on a hierarchy known as Pecking Order Theory (POT), favoring sequentially the use of internal resources, debt emission and, at last, stocks issues. The POT's empiric verification breaks up into methodological matters; some times being confirmed and other does not. In this article a different methodology is proposed recognizing the characteristics of companies such as size, profitability and growth, to explain the financing of the deficit. The results indicate that only the smaller size companies in the sample, negative profitability, and lower growth present a weak adherence to the POT's forecasts. For this reason this cannot be considered a general theory to explain the corporate capital structure.
KEYWORDS: Pecking Order; Capital structure; Profitability; Enterprise size; Growth of the assets.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.