As Raízes Comuns entre a Velha Economia Institucional e a Teoria Social de F. A. Hayek
Resumen
Este trabalho identifica no tratamento do aspecto evolucionário das instituições e na relação retroalimentadora entre estas e os indivíduos em uma ordem social a primeira raiz comum entre a Velha Economia Institucional e a Teoria Social de F.A. Hayek. A partir disso, são identificadas aproximações em outras concepções básicas, como as ideias de valor e equilíbrio. As possibilidades de identificar raízes comuns são expandidas quando alguns autores-chave da Velha Economia Institucional são abordados de maneira mais específica. A conclusão é que a tradição Institucionalista de John Commons é a mais adequada para o estabelecimento de uma raiz subjetivamente fundamentada para a explicação do aspecto processual do sistema social de modo semelhante à teoria de Hayek.
Descargas
Citas
COMMONS, J (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review, 21: 648-657.
DULBECCO, P.; DUTRAIVE, V (2001). The meaning of market: comparing austrian and institutional economics. Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas, Past and Present, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, p. 41-70.
GRUCHY, A (1972). Contemporary Economic Thought: The Contribution of Neo-Institutional Economics. Clifton, New Jersey: Augustus M. Kelley.
GRUCHY, A (1947). Modern Economic Thought: the American Contribution. New York: Prentice-Hall.
HAYEK, F. A (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, v. 4, n. 13, p. 33-54.
HAYEK, F. A (1946). Individualism: true and false. Hodges, Figgis & Company.
HAYEK, F. A (1965). Kinds of Rationalism. The Economic Studies Quarterly, Tokyo, Vol XV, 3.
HAYEK, F. A (1982). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Routledge & Kegan.
HAYEK, F. A (1963). Rules, perception, and intelligibility. Proceedings of the British Academy, XLVIII, London, pp. 321–344.
HAYEK, F. A (1967). Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HAYEK, F. A (1968). The confusion of language in political thought: with some suggestions for remedying it. Institute of Economic Affairs.
HAYEK, F. A (1955). The counter-revolution of science: studies on the use and abuse of reason. The Free Press of Glencoe Collier-Macmillan Limited.
HAYEK, F. A (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American economic review, v. 35, n. 4, p. 519-530.
HODGSON, G (2003a). Darwinism and Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(1): 85-97.
HODGSON, G (2008). How Veblen Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(2): 399-405.
HODGSON, G (2004). Reclaiming habit for institutional economics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25: 651-660.
HODGSON, G (2003b). The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27: 159-175.
HODGSON, G (2000). What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2): 317-329.
LEWIS, P (2014). Hayek: from economics as equilibrium analysis to economics as social theory. In: GARRISON, Roger W.; BARRY, Norman (Ed.). Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
NEALE, W (1987). Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 21 (3): 1177-1206.
O'DRISCOLL, G.; RIZZO, M (1996). The economics of time and ignorance. Psychology Press.
RUTHERFORD, M (1984). Thorstein Veblen and the Processes of Institutional Change. History of Political Economy, 16(3): 331-348.
RUTHERFORD, M (1981). Clarence Ayres and the instrumental theory of value. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(3): 657-673.
RUTHERFORD, M (1983). J. R. Commons’s Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 17(3): 721-744.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Revista de Economia Mackenzie pertenecen a los autores, los cuales otorgan a la Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie los derechos exclusivos para publicar el contenido. La reproducción total o parcial está prohibida sin la debida autorización del Comité Editorial, excepto cuando se haya autorizado previamente.
