People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation
Keywords:
Management model, People management, Competence management, Competence model, Validation processAbstract
This article aims to evaluate a people management model guided by the logic of the competencies, implemented ten years ago. The evaluation was based on the methodological premises of validation and legitimation of competence management models proposed by Markus, Cooper-Thomas and Alpress (2005). The categories considered were: constitutive definition, construct validity (content validity, face validity and reliability) and predictive validity. The research strategy was the descriptive case study, in which the information has been consolidated through the triangulation of the data acquired from documents, reports and interviews. There have been done twenty nine interviews with people identified as essential sources for the research, as such the project consultant, employees, managers, directors and the CEO of the company. It has been founded low consistence with respect to the accomplishment of the validation requirements. The results showed that the model analyzed presents operational problems, problems related to the comprehension of meanings and problems related to the organization, management and fulfillment of premises. In sum, the evaluation process has demonstrated weaknesses of the researched model related to the conceptual alignment, reach of the proposed objectives and guidance for the verification of the predictive validity. It has also been observed low credibility of the model for guiding hires, promotions, remunerations and development. The present study has showed that the evaluation of competence models through validation criterions promotes the approximation of premises, actions and results.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.