THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, INTERPERSONAL AND INFORMATIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE DIMENSIONS ON BURNOUT PREDICTION
Abstract
This study investigated the role of organizational justice dimensions (distributive, procedural, interpersonal and informational) as predictors of a burnout variable, emotional exhaustion (EE). Seventy workers (55.7%, males, 81.4% from private companies) completed a social-demographic questionnaire, the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach burnout inventory and the justice perceptions scale. Bivariate and partial correlation analyses indicated that: I) among justice dimensions, the interpersonal presented the strongest correlation with EE followed by the distributive dimension; II) the informational dimension was not significantly associated with burnout; III) when the distributive and interpersonal dimensions effects were statistically controlled, procedural dimension did not correlate significantly with EE. Gender differences were found. For males, interpersonal dimension was the only significant predictor of EE. Among females, the single significant predictor was distributive dimension. On the basis of such results it is suggested that companies settled in the south of Rio de Janeiro State consider the possible positive effect of a polite and respectful treatment on employee’s psychological health. In the present study, such a practice had a better effect on burnout than a fair distribution of outcomes/rewards. In addition, the above suggested practice of interpersonal justice involves low costs and may promote well-being and psychological health among organizational members. Finally, future studies are suggested.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.