Functional theory of human values: evidences of its adequacy in a brazilian state
Keywords:
Valores, motivações, funções, teoria, estrutura, conteúdoAbstract
This study examined the adequacy of the functional theory of values in the Brazilian state of Paraiba, focusing on the content and structure hypotheses derived from the theory. The first predicts the saturation of three value-items in each of the six theorized value subfunctions. The second predicts a duplex structure for the spatial representation of values based on two specific dimensions, type of orientation (personal, central and social) and type of motivator (materialist and idealist). Participants were 12,706 individuals from the general population with a mean age of 20 years, and in their majority female (58.5%), single (38.3%) and with a high school qualification (41.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis tested the content hypothesis, assuming that six value subfunctions would account for the variance among the 18 value-items (predicted model), compared to alternative factor structures with one, two, three or five factors. As expected, the proposed model had good fit to the data (AGFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.88, and RMSEA = 0.05) and was better fitting than alternative models. The structure hypothesis was tested by means of confirmatory multidimensional scaling (Proxscal), using the Tucker Phi (?) as an indicator of model fit. This fit indicator was above the recommended cut-off (? = 0.94), indicating that values can be represented in a 3 (type of orientation: personal, central, or social) x 2 (type of motivator: materialist or idealist) bi-dimensional space. Even with limitations, such as the use of a convenience sample instead of a probability sample, it can be concluded that the results support the adequacy of this theory in the studied Brazilian context.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Once the papers have been approved, the authors will assign their copyrights to this Journal. The Copyright Assignment Conditions include:
1. The Mackenzie Administration Journal holds the rights to all the papers published therein through assignment of copyright.
2. The author retains moral rights to the paper, including the right to identify the author whenever the article is published.
3. As of July 1, 2015 RAM adopted the CC-BY license standard (Creative Commons– BY). Authors are allowed to copy, distribute, display, transmit and adapt articles. Authors must attribute to RAM explicitly and clearly an article’s original publication (with reference to the journal’s name, edition, year and pages in which the article was originally published), yet without suggesting that RAM endorses the author or its use of the article. Contents are released by means of the CC-BY license to fully inter-operate with a variety of different systems and services, including for commercial purposes. In case of an article’s reuse or distribution, authors must make the article’s licensing terms clear to third parties. CC-BY criteria follow open access policies by major OA (Open Access) publishers and journals, such as PLoS, eLife, Biomed Central and Hindawi, among others.
4. When formally requested by the author, this Journal may allow the paper to be published as a chapter or part of a book. The only requirement is that prior publication in this Journal (Journal name, issue, year and pages) must be clearly and explicitly shown as a reference.